海外之声 | 中美应共同致力于国际货币体系的调整
导读
法定货币的稳定性深刻地影响着一个经济体的货币金融体系。政府无节制地印刷货币对货币本身及脆弱的金融体系的影响是毁灭性的。然而，自2008年以来，各国央行已经成为了很多债券和证券市场的主要买家；美国国债的增长速度远超过经济发展速度；由于投资者对于法定货币稳定性的担忧，投资不断流入房地产、贵金属以及比特币等新的投机形式的数字货币领域。这些现象都是国际货币金融体系可能失控的信号。因此，以美元为中心的国际货币体系可能需要大规模调整重置以避免崩溃。
十多年以来，中国一直号召建立一个不依赖美元的多储备货币体系。英国央行行长卡尼也在2008年的讲话中表示，各国央行可能需要建立自己的数字储备货币来取代美元。近年来，中国、美国以及欧盟的中央银行都在发展测试各自的中央银行数字货币，其中中国处于领先地位。
国际货币体系的调整需要中美两国的共同参与，紧密合作。而这将取决于中美两国未来的关系。最好的情况下，中美会加强金融合作，共同引入中央银行数字货币；如果未来中美关系紧张对立，国际经济和货币合作会严重受阻，中国的数字人民币可能与美元在国际货币中形成竞争关系。如果中美两国未能展开经济及货币方面的紧密合作，世界各国都将蒙受巨大损失。无论如何，当前的国际货币体系都将面临更大的压力。加强国际货币体系框架，我们还有很长的路要走。
作者 | 米卫凌•米德尔库普、大卫•马什
英文原文如下：
US, China must act to avoid monetary breakdown
Willem Middelkoop，Member of the OMFIF advisory board, Founder of the Dutch-based Commodity Discovery Fund
David Marsh，Chairman of OMFIF
Source: OMFIF
18 January 2021
With the rise of quantitative easing after the 2008 financial crisis, intensified by the Covid-19 pandemic, central banks are exerting ever-greater control over financial markets. This is part of an era of debt-fuelled state capitalism that is looking increasingly vulnerable. The system needs a reset. Joe Biden has an opportunity to strengthen the international monetary framework after he takes over the US presidency on 20 January – an immense challenge that will be nowhere near the top of his priorities.
One thing is clear. Anything the Biden administration undertakes in this field will fail unless the US involves China in a meaningful and constructive way. There is a strong probability it will all end in failure. Whatever happens, more investment funds will flow into safe havens, including gold.
We have been here before. Marco Polo, the legendary 13th century traveller, described how Mongol Emperor Kublai Khan had made himself the richest man on earth by creating ‘paper’ money as valuable as gold and silver. The system eventually broke down. Empires and republics rise and fall with the stability of fiat money.
The instrument of destruction is nearly always governmental misuse of the printing press. Over the past 100 years dozens of currencies, from the Weimar Republic mark in 1923 to the Zimbabwean dollar in 2008, were printed into oblivion. In his 2019 speech at the annual US Jackson Hole symposium Mark Carney, then governor of the Bank of England, underlined the vulnerability of the international monetary financial system. ‘Even a passing acquaintance with monetary history suggests that this centre won’t hold.’
Since 2008, the amount of securities held by major central banks as part of asset purchase programmes has grown to $19.5tn from $1.6tn. In many bond markets, central banks are the main buyers. Central banks have become large equity investors as well. The Bank of Japan owns over $400bn of Japanese equities, reflecting large purchases of exchange-traded funds as well as valuation increases. The Swiss National Bank – the central bank of a country now branded a currency manipulator by the US Treasury – owns nearly $200bn in stocks.
Since 1970, US nominal gross domestic product has risen 21-fold, while the national debt is up 70-fold. Worries about the stability of fiat money have been propelling investment flows into precious metals, real estate, art and classic cars as well as new speculative forms of digital money including bitcoin, now fluctuating around highs above $35,000.
These are all warning signals that the system could eventually spiral out of control. Worries about rising inflation, geopolitical conflict and social breakdown in advanced and emerging market economies cannot be dismissed as mere scaremongering. The world could seek to escape through a wholesale refashioning of the monetary system. Current Sino-American antagonism is hardly propitious for this. But, if the climate improved, what would be the main features of such a reset?
As long ago as 2008, Mervyn King, Carney’s predecessor at the Bank of England, said advanced economies would need debt restructuring and a recapitalisation of the financial system. Chinese authorities have been calling, for more than a decade, for a new multi-reserve currency system, defined as a ‘new global financial system […] not dependent on the US’.
In his Jackson Hole speech, Carney said central banks might need to create their own digital reserve currency to replace the dollar. The declining use of cash may require central banks to take a more active role in its replacement. Agustín Carstens, general manager of the Bank for International Settlements, asked in November 2019 ‘whether money itself needs to be reinvented for a changing environment’.
The planned tests of central bank digital currencies in China, the European Union and US shows central bankers are fast-tracking these developments, with China in the lead. The US Banking for All act, introduced in the US Senate in March 2020, calls for a digital dollar, accessible by citizens, which would require ‘Federal Reserve member banks to provide digital pass-through accounts, including access to Covid-19 aid payments’.
The US may well fear losing the privilege of owning the world’s supreme reserve currency and allocating a larger role to China. Yet without some form of closer co-operation, both the US and China – to say nothing of the rest of the world – will have much to lose.
What will happen next? Here are three scenarios, based on different degrees of tension between the US and China:
Low tension: The coronavirus crisis prompts both countries to increase co-operation. The US and China, possibly accompanied by the EU, will introduce CBDCs. As part of a monetary reset, Washington and Beijing agree on a larger role for the International Monetary Fund’s special drawing right, or a new ‘synthetic hegemonic currency,’ of the sort suggested by Carney in 2019. This would make China more willing to support the dollar, while strengthening the internationalisation of the renminbi, fulfilling one of China’s long-term goals.
Medium tension: While the US has the benefit of supplying the main world reserve currency, China’s economy fares much better, thanks to its earlier mastery of the pandemic. The economic fallout will not be severe enough to promote a substantial increase in worldwide co-operation. We will live through another four years of muddling through. Central bank balance sheets will become ever more stretched. The IMF will need to provide balance sheet support and debt restructuring aid to dozens of countries at risk of bankruptcy.
High tension：The US becomes alarmed by China’s growing economic and military power. Flare-ups over Taiwan are possible, with an attack on the island seen as increasingly likely. The world economy suffers severe damage, stymying recovery from the coronavirus crisis. The US steps up sanctions against China over human rights and geopolitical issues. With international economic and monetary co-operation seriously hampered, China declares its digital renminbi a rival to the dollar, withdraws from G20 meetings and tries to enhance co-operation in Asia on building a renminbi zone.
In all three scenarios, pressure on the international system will rise along with worries about higher inflation and currency debasement. Five years ago, OMFIF designated 2016 as the ‘year of the multicurrency system’ – a term that can be traced back to an article in the Financial Times in November 1979. In 2021 OMFIF will be placing still greater weight on the political fallout of currency competition. We face a bumpy ride.
Willem Middelkoop is Member of the OMFIF advisory board and Founder of the Dutch-based Commodity Discovery Fund and author of The Big Reset (2014). David Marsh is Chairman of OMFIF.
编译 谭姝文
编辑 查王皓天
来源 OMFIF
责编 李锦璇、蒋旭
监制 朱霜霜
点击查看近期热文
欢迎加入群聊
为了增进与粉丝们的互动，IMI财经观察建立了微信交流群，欢迎大家参与。
入群方法：加群主为微信好友（微信号：imi605）,添加时备注个人姓名（实名认证）、单位、职务等信息，经群主审核后，即可被拉进群。
欢迎读者朋友多多留言与我们交流互动，留言可换奖品：每月累积留言点赞数最多的读者将得到我们寄送的最新研究成果一份。
关于我们
中国人民大学国际货币研究所（IMI）成立于2009年12月20日，是专注于货币金融理论、政策与战略研究的非营利性学术研究机构和新型专业智库。研究所聘请了来自国内外科研院所、政府部门或金融机构的90余位著名专家学者担任顾问委员、学术委员和国际委员，80余位中青年专家担任研究员。
研究所长期聚焦国际金融、货币银行、宏观经济、金融监管、金融科技、地方金融等领域，定期举办国际货币论坛、货币金融（青年）圆桌会议、大金融思想沙龙、麦金农大讲坛、陶湘国际金融讲堂、IMF经济展望报告发布会、金融科技公开课等高层次系列论坛或讲座，形成了《人民币国际化报告》《天府金融指数报告》《金融机构国际化报告》《宏观经济月度分析报告》等一大批具有重要理论和政策影响力的学术成果。
2018年，研究所荣获中国人民大学优秀院属研究机构奖，在182家参评机构中排名第一；在《智库大数据报告（2018）》中获评A等级，在参评的1065个中国智库中排名前5%。2019年，入选智库头条号指数（前50名），成为第一象限28家智库之一。
国际货币网：http://www.imi.ruc.edu.cn
微信号：IMI财经观察
（点击识别下方二维码关注我们）
理事单位申请、
学术研究和会议合作
联系方式:
只分享最有价值的财经视点
We only share the most valuable financial insights.